Never quite sure where best to report issues. Bottom line there appears to be a bunch of image variations missing from balenalib which is making multi arch builds fail. The effect of course is that I can’t use %%BALENA_MACHINE_NAME%% in my Dockerfiles as the file is only available for some architect…

Great catch! Something like this particular issue would probably be best reported directly in the GitHub repo, but, this works too. I’ll go ahead and open up an Issue for it, and ping the maintainer. :slight_smile:

Another one. Available: balenalib/amd64-alpine-python:3.8.10-3.13 Not available: balenalib/raspberrypi4-64-alpine-python:3.8.10-3.13 balenalib/raspberrypi4-64-alpine-python:3.8.10 Yet there is a build for it => base-images/balena-base-images/python/raspberrypi4-64/alpine/3.13 at master · balen…

I also can’t seem to find any Alpine containers for arm5 or 6 at all. So the multi arch builds keep failing when I use %%BALENA_ARCH%%. Assuming they all follow the same naming convention, I can’t find any balenalib/armv6 at all but there seems to be a Dockerfile for it: base-images/balena-base-imag…

Do you this is something that will fall on the radar sometime soon, or should I be looking for a workaround in the meantime?

Hey @maggie0002 , Just want to let you know that all the images you mentioned are now available, sorry for the inconvenience since we’re having some changes in the build servers so some tags are not built as expected. Please let us know if you need further support

Thanks @nghiant2710 . I’m struggling to find the Raspberry Pi Zero images though. Do they come under balenalib/armv5e? It doesn’t seem like there is an Alpine one. Nor can I find some of the date stamped images (such as balenalib/aarch64-alpine-python:3.8.10-3.13-20210506). I am looking to use each o…

Hey @maggie0002 , You can use balenalib/rpi-alpine-python:3.8.10-3.13-20210506 for armv6 (raspberry pi zero). armv5 is no longer supported so we don’t have any base images for that architecture.

Will %%BALENA_ARCH%% resolve to RPI automatically? I am trying to deploy to multiple devices through one Docker-compose file. And there doesn’t appear to be matching date tag on the RPI images. It is set to 20210506 as you mentioned in the example in your post, but the aarch64 and armv7hf are 20210…

I ran a deploy and can confirm that %%BALENA_ARCH%% does resolve to ‘rpi’ when deploying to that architecture which is good news. It seems then the only issue left is that there isn’t a corresponding image for RPI with the same date as aarch64 and armv7fh. This one fails: balenalib/rpi-alpine-pyth…

@nghiant2710 would this be possible today? I was hoping to get this deploy done before the weekend.

Missing images from balenalib

Product support

maggie0002 September 17, 2021, 8:26pm 30

@nghiant2710 I have moved one of my containers to Alpine and missing the following container:

balenalib/rpi-alpine-python:3.8.10-3.13-build-20210603

Could you add it?

Topic		Replies	Views
Balena CLI suddenly fail: "The requested image's platform (linux/amd64) does not match the detected host platform" Product support	29	9788	March 24, 2025
Balenalib base images larger balenaOS	12	758	July 20, 2020
BalenaOS OpenJDK image for Raspberry Pi balenaOS raspberrypizero	2	862	July 15, 2020
Error with cloud arm64 build - 404 no such image Product support docker	39	1508	August 17, 2020
manifest for balenalib/raspberrypi4-64-ubuntu-node:focal not found balenaOS	6	512	March 31, 2021

Missing images from balenalib

Related topics