Thanks for the update and the investigation. We’ve been thoroughly testing the fin in a controlled high-temperature environment and we’re making progress at understanding the situation.
I’ll post a more detailed update in the next day or two.
We are eagerly awaiting updates on this topic as we too have Fins deployed in hot environments and want to take steps to mitigate potential connectivity loss as soon as possible.
So far, the removal of the top cover seems to provide enough air circulation to cool down the Fin. The failures occur once in few days and is quite tolerable at the moment.
Of course, this is a temporary solution to keep things running.
I just wanted to share a quick update on our end of the testing. As I mentioned before, we’ve been running several tests in a controlled temperature environment, and we’ve made good progress. We’re preparing a detailed report to share in the next few days. In the meantime, let me know if you have any questions.
I’ve just wanted to let you know that we have published our root-cause analysis (RCA) of the thermal issue discussed in this thread. Don’t hesitate to reach out to us if you have any questions about the fix itself or the process to get your units fixed.
Hi Carl, I didn’t write the blog post, but it doesn’t seem like Wifi is affected, only ethernet:
It also means that those devices relying on ethernet connectivity are disconnected at these higher temperatures since the ethernet bridge is also USB-based.
I had checked the datasheet and seen that it shares the SDIO channel with eMMC rather than USB so thank you for confirming that.
I would also like to confirm this will break mPCIe since its on the USB hub? In our use case we use it for GSM and we think we have seen this behaviour.
We did some independent heat-chamber testing on our workshop and found the fix to be working nicely, BalenaFIN handled over +70C ambient temperature nicely.